3 reviews
Much holding of heads and beseeching the skies in this overlong and overwrought melodrama from D. W. Griffith. It's clearly had more money spent on it for costumes and set design than most Biograph pictures, and is almost twice as long as many of their shorts from that period, but that added length makes it something of a chore to sit through. Missing intertitles doesn't help...
- JoeytheBrit
- May 11, 2020
- Permalink
- deickemeyer
- Dec 5, 2014
- Permalink
What you have to understand about these short films that the 34 year old D.W. Griffith was churning out twice-weekly is that his emphasis was on scenery rather than story. Let's face it, scripts before 1940 were basically stage plays, and before the talking period, scenarios were robbed of dialogue which meant that actors had to improvise under the guidance of the director. You cannot judge this short piece by the script or story, but by what the camera frames. Let's not forget that cinema at this stage was just a moving painting. Griffith was a cinematic Hogarth at this stage and used his short films as a painting. Therefore, you need to watch this offering as a painting that moves.
- Single-Black-Male
- Nov 3, 2004
- Permalink