Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Earth's Final Hours (2011 TV Movie)
1/10
Calling It Mindless Drivel Would Actually Be A Compliment
22 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Quick Summary: It's a bomb.

This is yet another of the mind-numbing, inane films penned by writers who couldn't find their own heads with both hands and a "brainless twit" detector, and cranked out on a far-too-regular basis by the SyFy channel.

I shall not dwell on the acting, because let's face it: Who can concentrate on the acting when your neurons are recoiling in horror at the lines the actors are forced, (I suspect, at gunpoint), to say? Nor shall I long dwell on the laughably lame-brained scene in which a scientist with an enormous hole through his chest, (front-to-back, and through which, even Stevie Wonder could chuck a football), manages somehow, (chortle), to gasp out his final words, (which are, of course, cryptic--even though they are the key to "the very survival of mankind itself").

Incredibly, (by comparison with the next eighty minutes), that scene is one of the more believable moments in this disgrace. There is not a single shred of even grade-school scientific knowledge evident in this--supposedly, science fiction--film.

I felt considerable sympathy for the actors, most of whom, I feel sure, have sequestered themselves in remote caves, living on lichens and grubs rather than show themselves in public after this. Frankly, if I found myself cast in such an embarrassingly dreadful flick, my first thought would be to cast my agent into an active volcano.

The main premise--if you stoop to call it that--is that the Earth suddenly, instantly, stops rotating about its axis, (the mechanism by which this occurs is so dim-witted as not to be worthy of serious mention). Oddly, most people don't seem notice this drastic event, save for one or two who wonder why the sun is still overhead at midnight.

So. If the Earth *were* to stop suddenly, wouldn't you mention it to someone? Well, no, as it turns out, because you wouldn't be alive to do so--having been killed within microseconds as a result of the catastrophe.

Though you don't notice, (because it rotates *with* the Earth at the same speed), the atmosphere travels at a speed of about 1,100 miles-per-hour at the equator. Even if the Earth could, somehow, instantly stop rotating, the atmosphere wouldn't; suddenly supersonic winds, would sweep the Earth clear of you, your house, forests, skyscrapers, politicians, the entire body of work of Jerry Lewis, and the offices of the SyFy channel.

Even ignoring the reality of those winds, your own inertia would fling you into the stratosphere, along with every car, locomotive, building, oil tanker and chupacabra on the planet.

But wait! There's more!

The Earth masses some six sextillion tons: If it suddenly came to a screeching halt, well, the energy of that tremendous inertia has to go somewhere--and so it would. It would be expressed as heat. Lots of heat. We're talking a mind-bogglingly amount of heat, here. The entire planet would become almost instantaneously molten.

Between inertia, the hyper-hurricane winds and the all-encompassing lava, nothing whatsoever would survive: Not even that inedible fruitcake that gets re-gifted and passed on to successive generations during the holidays.

There is more than a century of excellent science fiction available--much in the public domain. Why, instead of harvesting that treasure-trove and producing works of quality, the executives at SyFy keep foisting such imbecility as "Earth's Final Hours" onto the public is an utter mystery. And an insult.

Not to mock to the Vietnam War protests, I nonetheless appeal to SyFy to "Stop The Bombing."

Did I mention the movie was awful?
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hanna (2011)
2/10
Dante should create a new circle of Hades for the perpetrators of this flick
19 April 2011
I want my money back--with punitive damages for insulting my intelligence.

Let's start with what seems to be the premise: An ex-CIA agent raises his daughter to be an expert assassin.

Mr. Master-Killer raises his daughter in the remote wilderness of Finland, and, while we see he spends a great deal of time instructing her on the fine-points of deception, killing, general mayhem, blue whales and supernovae, (the latter two *so* important in the everyday workings of espionage and assassination. Great for a well-rounded education, though), it never seems to have occurred to this so-called super-spy that she may need to actually *experience* civilization: At one point we see the girl marveling at a fluorescent light--to the amazement of an innkeeper. Hanna mentions to said innkeeper how she believes electricity was *invented* by Thomas Edison. Huh? What?

So much for a well-rounded education.

Hanna doesn't know civilization, people, conversation, propriety--anything, really, beyond killing efficiently and without mercy.

While Saoirse Ronan is superb in her role as an innocent(?) miscreant, Cate Blanchet--an otherwise unique and dynamic actress--struggles with the character she portrays, and one can only wonder what evil stroke of nature forced her to take the role. Eric Bana is his usual, banal self, and--much like his appearance in Star Trek--could have phoned in his boring, lackluster performance.

This travesty was scripted by two writers having almost no credits between them: Seth Lochhead and David Farr. Having suffered through this disgrace, I can only conclude that they must live in their respective Mommys' basements and really, really, desperately need to get out more. At the very least, they need to start reading. Anything. Anything at all--which they clearly don't. The writers show little knowledge of the world as you and I know it, and are absolutely clueless as to the workings, intrigues and procedures of the intelligence community. They are equally clueless as to what make a good script.

As, apparently, are the producers.

The writing is abhorrent; the film-work, competent though visually dismal; the premise, fascinating; the execution of the premise, awful.

And--the least annoying thing in a film chock full of annoying things, but indicative of the film's total disregard for reality, (and the intelligence of the audience)--why couldn't they even get the CIA's logo right?

My advice: Spend your time watching something better thought-out, researched, written, and far more cerebral.

The Three Stooges comes to mind.
41 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
World's End (2010)
1/10
What a waste of film stock--and my time
16 October 2010
This is Phillip Kim's very first screenplay. If there is any justice in the world it will be his last.

I wasted 101 minutes on this turkey. Don't make the same mistake.

Two-dollar budget, one-dollar characters, confused, contradictory and abysmal script and a director who couldn't direct traffic on a Sunday morning. Not an original idea in it. Either the investors didn't read the script, or they *read* the script and figured it was a great tax write-off.

The movie has two, flawed, premises: The world will soon run out of oil--which proves typist Phillip Kim, (can't truthfully call him a writer), spends too much time reading comic books instead of scientific journals--and that a world-wide cancer wiped out the female population, (Frank Herbert did that far, far better in "The White Plague"). The fact that there are a number of females in the film--most of whom say and do nothing and don't really need to be there--shows that the typist couldn't stay on track with his own inept plot.

Skip Downstream--better yet, *toss* it downstream--and watch the better post-apocalyptic movies this disgrace has ripped off: A Boy and his Dog. Logan's Run. Mad Max. The Postman. Even Waterworld is a far better film.

Did I mention this movie is bad?
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ark (2009– )
9/10
Suspenseful Sci-Fi Thriller
23 July 2010
Starring and produced by Renee O'Connor (Xena: Warrior Princess) through her ROC Pictures, the characters in "Ark" find themselves on a huge spaceship, apparently light-years from Earth.

Connie (O'Connor) took a nap on her couch in 2008 and awakened aboard the mysterious craft. Daryl played by Adam Cardon (Thor's Hammer, Days of Our Lives), is a young astronaut whose last recollection is being on Earth in the year 1959. Both find evidence that they are believed dead by their loved ones back home. Their deaths--so it might seem--faked.

Echoing Harlan Ellison's "Starlost" with a twist or two, "Ark" is an intriguing Sci-Fi thriller which explores the character's attempts to cope with the immediacy of their plight and find answers to the enigma of where they are, why and how they came to be there, and who--or what--is onboard with them.

The production seems to have encountered financing problems and I have not been able to find the series in it's entirety. The first 45 minute episode may be seen as a series of "webisodes" on Hulu as of this date. I guarantee you'll be wanting to see more. I certainly do. Let's hope the full series is not far off.
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed