I saw this movie as a child and it tore me apart. I had never felt this way about a movie before. I read the book later, as an adult. I am happy that I waited to do that, because the book is not like the movie. The characters and the story are darker and more complex. That isn't to say that the movie is weaker. Admittedly, there are some fundamental differences. Some things are changed, some key aspects and characters are left out in the movie adaptation. Nonetheless, it carries the spirit and essence of the novel it was inspired from. The differences are not disappointing or offensive, but balancing. They complete and complement each other. Both movie and book are unique and powerful in their own way, each offering something the other can't.
I find Gwenwyfar equally annoying in both (though I admit her redeeming features) and Morgaine equally amazing. It Lancelost and Gwenwyfar's relationship that is the most famous one. But I love the relationship between Arthur and Morgaine more. I remember how deeply touched and excited I was while watching for the first time. I was too young to understand all the complex nuances and subtle hints. As I got older, I saw it on a whole new level. I had an acquaintance who loves the movie and the book as much as me, but who could not accept that the love between Arthur and Morgaine goes beyond sibling love. I was quite moved. Even the first time, when I couldn't see everything that was left unsaid. I could feel it. I was quite shocked and excited to see that the nature of their feelings was presented much more unequivocally in the book and that I hadn't been wrong in what I had sensed.
I also came to discover new sides to the characters that were left out in the movie. They turned out to be much more ambiguous and layered than what we are led to believe in the film. The other wonderful surprise was the role Accolon that turns out to be much more substantial than what we see on the screen. And then there is Kevin, who doesn't appear there at all, but is a key figure in the novel and one of my three favourite characters, the other two being Arthur and Morgaine. The only serious gripe that I've got is the infatuation of Morgaine with Lancelot that doesn't bring anything neither to her as a character, nor to the overall story. It actually burdens the story and it feels very weird and out of place. Even though Arthur and Morgaine's relationship is supposed to be the scandalous element, I found her obsession with Lancelot and the way he treated her much more disturbing. I don't actually believe that she truly desires him. I actually think she sees him as another version of Arthur. And since she can't openly act on or even admit to herself how she feels about Arthur, she is projecting all those desires on Lancelot. But other than that, the whole plot line, the character development, the ideas invested, everything is truly outstanding.
What I want to close with is my belief that all those who claim that the story is anti-Christian, are wrong. It doesn't speak against Christianity. Pagans are presented at an equally harsh light. I believe it speaks against bigotry and extremism in all their forms, in all religions. It is a lesson she comes to learn the hard way. That names, images and symbols are not good or evil, right or wrong by themselves, but rather what we make them to be. It is the basic message the book begins with. The world around us is shaped and ruled by our thoughts and believes and there is no such thing as true tale, truth has many faces. Even the old goddess has many faces and seems to be equally generous and cruel. In the end Arthur tells Morgaine that to him she is the goddess. Knowing how he feels about her, it is a fitting comparison, aiming to show that ultimately we all choose our own idols. If we can believe in one deity with many faces, why not in its new incarnations? If people come and go, if they are born and die and change a thousand times during their lifetimes, why do they not allow the same to those in whose image they were supposedly created? I feel that this is the main point of the story and its true heart. It calls not to a god or a goddess, it doesn't speak against or in defense of any religion, but rather it speaks about faith, faith in humanity. It is what Merlin tells to Vivian before he dies. That maybe the truest expression of the divine is our human nature and the joy we find in being humans.
I find Gwenwyfar equally annoying in both (though I admit her redeeming features) and Morgaine equally amazing. It Lancelost and Gwenwyfar's relationship that is the most famous one. But I love the relationship between Arthur and Morgaine more. I remember how deeply touched and excited I was while watching for the first time. I was too young to understand all the complex nuances and subtle hints. As I got older, I saw it on a whole new level. I had an acquaintance who loves the movie and the book as much as me, but who could not accept that the love between Arthur and Morgaine goes beyond sibling love. I was quite moved. Even the first time, when I couldn't see everything that was left unsaid. I could feel it. I was quite shocked and excited to see that the nature of their feelings was presented much more unequivocally in the book and that I hadn't been wrong in what I had sensed.
I also came to discover new sides to the characters that were left out in the movie. They turned out to be much more ambiguous and layered than what we are led to believe in the film. The other wonderful surprise was the role Accolon that turns out to be much more substantial than what we see on the screen. And then there is Kevin, who doesn't appear there at all, but is a key figure in the novel and one of my three favourite characters, the other two being Arthur and Morgaine. The only serious gripe that I've got is the infatuation of Morgaine with Lancelot that doesn't bring anything neither to her as a character, nor to the overall story. It actually burdens the story and it feels very weird and out of place. Even though Arthur and Morgaine's relationship is supposed to be the scandalous element, I found her obsession with Lancelot and the way he treated her much more disturbing. I don't actually believe that she truly desires him. I actually think she sees him as another version of Arthur. And since she can't openly act on or even admit to herself how she feels about Arthur, she is projecting all those desires on Lancelot. But other than that, the whole plot line, the character development, the ideas invested, everything is truly outstanding.
What I want to close with is my belief that all those who claim that the story is anti-Christian, are wrong. It doesn't speak against Christianity. Pagans are presented at an equally harsh light. I believe it speaks against bigotry and extremism in all their forms, in all religions. It is a lesson she comes to learn the hard way. That names, images and symbols are not good or evil, right or wrong by themselves, but rather what we make them to be. It is the basic message the book begins with. The world around us is shaped and ruled by our thoughts and believes and there is no such thing as true tale, truth has many faces. Even the old goddess has many faces and seems to be equally generous and cruel. In the end Arthur tells Morgaine that to him she is the goddess. Knowing how he feels about her, it is a fitting comparison, aiming to show that ultimately we all choose our own idols. If we can believe in one deity with many faces, why not in its new incarnations? If people come and go, if they are born and die and change a thousand times during their lifetimes, why do they not allow the same to those in whose image they were supposedly created? I feel that this is the main point of the story and its true heart. It calls not to a god or a goddess, it doesn't speak against or in defense of any religion, but rather it speaks about faith, faith in humanity. It is what Merlin tells to Vivian before he dies. That maybe the truest expression of the divine is our human nature and the joy we find in being humans.
Tell Your Friends