"Hawaii Five-O" Not That Much Different (TV Episode 1969) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Ugghh!!
planktonrules10 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The show begins with the editor of a peace magazine being shot to death in front of a crowd of his followers. Someone is responsible but Five-O seems to have few leads and the peace-loving youth don't trust the police and offer little in the way of support.

This episode was a huge letdown following the wonderful two-part episode "Once Upon a Time". Most of this is because the high quality and excellent writing of "Once Upon a Time" made it all the more apparent that "Not That Much Different" was one of the poorer episodes of the first season.

There are many reasons this was a bad episode. The most serious was how the writers tried (in vain) to convince us that Steve McGarrett was kind of cool and could relate to the disaffected youth of the day--when it was so obvious he couldn't. As a result, McGarrett behaved in ways that were so obviously phony and transparent. For example, after talking to the protesters about the murder, in the next scene he is sitting in his office strumming a guitar!! From where did that guitar magically materialize?! Was it simply there to remind us Steve-o was cool?! Then, at the end, Steve gives a lofty and rather fake soliloquy in which he talks about those wild and crazy kids! He tells Danno, "All the flowers of all the tomorrows are in the seeds of today." I think we got some pretty good seeds in those other kids, Danno, don't you?". Yeah, sure...dream on hippie boy.

In addition to McGarrett seeming like a phony, the other main problems about the episode were the police involvement and the actual solving of the crime--which seemed secondary at best. Instead, the youth all try to solve the murder and work together for a common good. Booorriiinnngg!! Where is the police work and fine officers of HPD? Oh, and while I think about it, there is one other silly and unforgivable problem in the show. At the end, the bad guy is shooting again and again at McGarrett but McGarrett does not return fire until after the guy had unloaded eight unanswered shots at him. The problem is that the bad guy is firing a .38 caliber pistol--and it only holds six shots and the guy never reloaded!!!!!!! Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy!
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Many problems with this episode
cheriesuv25 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This episode was one of the worst of the first season.

First of all, it felt like some kind of Jack Webb show. It was full of lectures about how important cops are and how crucial their work is. Really, if I wanted to hear copaganda lectures I would just watch Dragnet, which has a different lecture each episode.

Secondly, and here's the spoiler part, the bad guy, it turns out, shot the victim from across the street while the victim was standing in a crowd of people. And he didn't just shoot randomly into the crowd, he was actually aiming for the person he shot. So he must have been using some kind of sniper rifle right? No, he shot the guy he was aiming at who was standing in a crowd of people from across the street with a .38 caliber revolver. This guy is one master marksman. Then, at the end, he gets into a gunfight with McGarrett on the cliffs over looking the ocean. He shoots at McGarrett a few times with that same .38 Special revolver, but he just can't seem to hit him. What happened to the guy who was able to hit his ex-friend from across the street?

And thirdly, the five-0 crew wasn't really even in this episode much. The whole thing focused on the group of peacenik kids and their internecine squabbles, and McGarrett and Danno and everyone didn't really do much. I don't think they actually solved anything. It was all the kids' doing. They did the most at the end when McGarrett captured the bad guy, who, it turns out, is a very philosophical and erudite guy who likes to quote Greek tragedies and what not.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dumb plot
lbkrahn28 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed McGarrett's lines when he is telling the kids about how he abhors violence but that there are animals in the world that the police have to protect themselves from. This episode seemed so dated because the kids didn't have enough sense to figure out that some violence is necessary in this world. They were supposed to be intellectuals but fell far short of this in their character development.

The huge plot hole in this episode, in my opinion, is that it is not made clear to the audience why the bad guy killed people. Was there no reason at all? That wasn't explained. Did he kill people just because he felt like it? I still have no idea what his motives or reasoning was. That made the end of the episode unsatisfying and just plain dumb. This was not one of the better episodes in the first season.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Protester Is Killed
StrictlyConfidential2 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
McGarrett attempts to prove he's an officer-of-the-peace after a protester is shot during an anti-war demonstration. But his investigation encounters some unexpected resistance from the slain man's pacifist associates.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed