Flynn disappoints on multiple fronts, failing to deliver a balanced or engaging narrative. The film is marred by a one-sided portrayal that seeks to glorify Flynn and cast him in a heroic light, often at the expense of nuance and factual accuracy. It indulges in excessive self-aggrandizement, presenting Flynn as an ultimately infallible figure, a narrative choice that feels more like a public relations exercise than a genuine attempt at storytelling.
The script is laden with clichés and lacks the depth needed to explore the complexities of Flynn's career and controversies. The direction is uninspired, with scenes that seem designed more to bolster Flynn's image than to provide an objective account of his actions and decisions. The portrayal of key events in Flynn's career is overly simplistic, glossing over critical details and controversies that are essential to understanding the full picture.
Moreover, the film's pacing is erratic, with slow, tedious stretches that fail to build any real tension or engagement. The characters, including Flynn himself, are depicted in a flat, unconvincing manner, making it difficult for viewers to invest in their stories. The lack of critical examination or balanced viewpoints leaves the film feeling shallow and unfulfilling.
In the end, Flynn falls short of being a compelling biopic or a credible historical account. It comes across as an overt attempt to rehabilitate Flynn's image rather than a genuine exploration of his life and career. This approach not only undermines the film's credibility but also alienates viewers seeking an insightful and balanced perspective. Overall, it is a missed opportunity to engage with a controversial figure's complex legacy in a meaningful way.